首页> 外文OA文献 >Prediction of Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Liver Failure-Systematic Review of Prediction Models
【2h】

Prediction of Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Liver Failure-Systematic Review of Prediction Models

机译:急性肝衰竭患者预后不良的预测-预测模型的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Acute liver failure is a rare disease with high mortality and liver transplantation is the only life saving therapy. Accurate prognosis of ALF is crucial for proper intervention. Aim: To identify and characterize newly developed prognostic models of mortality for ALF patients, assess study quality, identify important variables and provide recommendations for the development of improved models in the future. Methods: The online databases MEDLINE (R) (1950-2012) and EMBASE (R) (1980-2012) were searched for English-language articles that reported original data from clinical trials or observational studies on prognostic models in ALF patients. Studies were included if they developed a new model or modified existing prognostic models. The studies were evaluated based on an existing framework for scoring the methodological and reporting quality of prognostic models. Results: Twenty studies were included, of which 18 reported on newly developed models, 1 on modification of the Kings College Criteria (KCC) and 1 on the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Ten studies compared the newly developed models to previously existing models (e.g. KCC); they all reported that the new models were superior. In the 12-point methodological quality score, only one study scored full points. On the 38-point reporting score, no study scored full points. There was a general lack of reporting on missing values. In addition, none of the studies used performance measures for calibration and accuracy (e.g. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, Brier score), and only 5 studies used the AUC as a measure of discrimination. Conclusions: There are many studies on prognostic models for ALF but they show methodological and reporting limitations. Future studies could be improved by better reporting and handling of missing data, the inclusion of model calibration aspects, use of absolute risk measures, explicit considerations for variable selection, the use of a more extensive set of reference models and more thorough validation. Citation: Wlodzimirow KA, Eslami S, Chamuleau RAFM, Nieuwoudt M, Abu-Hanna A (2012) Prediction of Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Liver Failure-Systematic Review of Prediction Models. PLoS ONE 7(12): e50952. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050952
机译:简介:急性肝衰竭是一种罕见的高死亡率疾病,肝移植是唯一挽救生命的疗法。 ALF的正确预后对于正确干预至关重要。目的:为ALF患者识别和鉴定新近开发的死亡率预测模型,评估研究质量,确定重要变量,并为今后开发改良模型提供建议。方法:在在线数据库MEDLINE(1950-2012)和EMBASE(1980-2012)中搜索英语文章,这些文章报道了ALF患者预后模型的临床试验或观察性研究的原始数据。如果研究开发了新模型或修改了现有的预后模型,则将其纳入研究。根据现有框架对研究进行评估,以对预后模型的方法学和报告质量进行评分。结果:纳入了20项研究,其中18项报道了新开发的模型,1项报道了对Kings College Criteria(KCC)的修改,1项报道了终末期肝病模型(MELD)。十项研究将新开发的模型与以前的模型(例如KCC)进行了比较;他们都报告说,新模型更出色。在12分的方法学质量得分中,只有一项研究获得了满分。在38分的报告分数上,没有研究获得满分。普遍缺乏关于缺失价值的报告。此外,没有一项研究使用性能指标来进行校准和准确性(例如,Hosmer-Lemeshow统计数据,Brier得分),只有5项研究使用了AUC作为判别指标。结论:关于ALF的预后模型有许多研究,但它们显示了方法学和报告的局限性。可以通过更好地报告和处理丢失的数据,包括模型校准方面,使用绝对风险度量,对变量选择进行明确考虑,使用更广泛的参考模型集以及更彻底的验证来改善未来的研究。引文:Wlodzimirow KA,Eslami S,Chamuleau RAFM,​​Nieuwoudt M,Abu-Hanna A(2012)对急性肝衰竭患者预后不良的预测-预测模型的系统综述。公共科学学报7(12):e50952。 doi:10.1371 / journal.pone.0050952

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号